In a 6-3 ruling by Justice Alito, the Court overrules Roe and Casey, upholding the Mississippi abortion law
I needed this today
When you come across a feel-good thing.
Staring into the abyss and it's staring right back
- By - kadeel
Found this pamphlet advertising the turnpike from when it opened and some of these descriptions are cracking me up lol "No congestion… no strain!"
Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.
- By - WaffleHouseStanAcct
It's actually scary how close Tatum is to Kobe 😱
Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.
When you come across a feel-good thing.
- By - VeryMuchAwake
GAME THREAD: Golden State Warriors (53-29) @ Boston Celtics (51-31) - (June 16, 2022)
Add my power to yours.
You got me stone faced
- By - NBA_MOD
‘Soup Nazi’ joke that totally went over my head for years
Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.
- By - peji911
The people who bought my house are saying I have to pay them 23k for a new roof.
Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.
- By - Randomuser8500
GAME THREAD: Boston Celtics (51-31) @ Golden State Warriors (53-29) - (June 13, 2022)
When you come across a feel-good thing.
- By - NBA_MOD
Condom question
Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.
When you come across a feel-good thing.
- By - starmizzle
GAME THREAD: Golden State Warriors (53-29) @ Boston Celtics (51-31) - (June 08, 2022)
Thank you stranger. Shows the award.
- By - NBA_MOD
most legitimate supreme court opinion
Good show
What show is it?
Jokic brothers
6-3, wasn't even that close.
tbf looks like Roberts only concurred in the judgment, not in the overturning. (though, not having read his opinion yet, i assume it would water roe and casey down to the point of uselessness)
how does that matter? It still ended 6-3. Why do people put so much focus on what Roberts thinks and says?
The part of the opinion (formally) overturning Roe was only 5-4.
I mean it’s debatable right? What’s the point of an nba subreddit if we can’t violently debate each other? Does chet have the requisite mens rea to be convicted of being criminally ugly? Is he intentionally ugly? Or is he just recklessly ugly? Don’t bother replying if you can’t grasp the basic principles of American criminal law LMAO
assuming the criminal ugliness statute doesn't specify a knowledge or purpose mens rea then under mpc 2.02(3) recklessness is sufficient. and he's def consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that he's criminally ugly. so i think he's very plausibly criminally ugly
Cars got 5mph safer, but humans remained stupid.
Probably got even stupider. They didn't have cell phones to get distracted by then.
Why did the beatles not make tribute
Tribute is actually about Maxwell's Silver Hammer fyi
Myles Garrett turned Mason Rudolph's head into pasta sauce
In defense of Daniel Jones, he only played 11 games. His 17-game pace would've put him around 40.
Tua only played 13, including one he left on the second drive.
lowest effort
Own that fraud
refs ruined this game
Flair checks out
cause and effect brother
It's a smart line and a smart crowd will appreciate it
There are separate questions here. It is well settled that Smith eliminated the Constitutional requirement that religious exercise be protected from generally-applicable laws but then Congress essentially returned things to the status quo ante by passing the RFRA. Hobby Lobby and similar decisions apply the RFRA or state analogues and not the First Amendment.
Except RFRA didn't return things to the status quo ante vis-a-vis state legislation or the first amendment on its own after Boerne
depends on your background. i’m big into DEI so I say “x firm does a great job promoting DEI for the following reasons” and i cite how the company did promote DEI. My resume also shows history of promoting DEI.
Interesting. My background is pretty PI-heavy, so I suppose I should think about how to spin that positively.
The solution isn’t “cracking down,” it’s redesigning cities at a human scale, with infrastructure that puts pedestrians, transit users, and cyclists first and makes driving so uncomfortable and inferior to other options that almost people stop doing it.
You need both. Even the most walkable cities have roads with cars on them. If you don't enforce the traffic laws against those drivers the best infrastructure in the world can't stop them from speeding or driving dangerously.
We make the roads convenient for cars to go as fast as possible.. instead we redesign our roads to make them go slower.
I understand that. My point is that redesigning roads to encourage drivers to go slow will not alone stop drivers from driving fast.
[удалено]
Tenuous would be better than a lot of what I've seen. Other than a few frequent truisms ("document everything," "call a lawyer," "depends on your state"), it seems to me that comments are as likely to be downright wrong as they are to be imperfect or incomplete.
[удалено]
Lawyers aren't infallible, but neither is a legal advice subreddit most of whose commenters aren't lawyers.
Aren't you glad you have access to me and my covfefe?
curry passing up the wide open three
Where would one even fuck a Millennium Falcon?
In their bedroom, probably
Jaylen brown complains about the silliest shit. Yeah man you didn't foul him when you pulled down his jersey
talking about the horford foul
ah gotcha
this is a fantastic bit
We don't give legal advice here. But any legal help you'll get is likely going to cost more than $100. I'd try talking to your mom and working this out that way.