Man, I’ll never forget the old lady who lived next to us growing up. Worked all her life at the local nursing home. She lost half of her foot due to diabetes I think, and could barely walk.
It is good, but it can have consequences too. In Germany they had a brief period where women were offered jobs in legal brothels and turning that down meant cutting benefits. They later carved out an exemption to sex work.
I agree, it is not a perfect system. Some jobs should be differently regulated than others. That being said, there are plenty of peolple who abuse unemployment benefits.
Welfares for those who are unable to work and in need of money to get by. Not a single cent for sloths who are perfectly eligible for employment yet refusing to get a job.
It should be that you only can get a month or two and then you loose it (obvious exceptions to disabled etc) and you can only get back on if you have a few months of taxes, if you constantly going onto benefits then you loose it all together for a two years, those who immigrate into the country cannot go onto benefits until they have 5 years of paying taxes etc but only receive limited benefits until 10 years of work.
And like half of the country (Movimento 5 Stelle, coff coff) is mad at it because "muh the poor people". They are the ones who introduced it, and it's literally paying for votes.
Most European countries actually have this kind of policy. The issue usually isn't accepting/declining job offers, but accepting and then calling in sick until you get fired. Can't cut benefits for getting sick...
IMPORTANT: On
I wished America did that as well…
I know some states do. If you refuse a reasonable job offer while on unemployment they will cut your benefits.
It’s one thing if you just can’t work, but another if you won’t. Finally, a country has found that difference.
Good. In Australia we have "work for the dole", which is basically charity/non for profit type work.
We called it the 'pretty obvious if you think about it' resolution,,,,
Welfare should be used as a safety net to help people get back on their feet, not as a permanent state of living.
I wish the US was stricter on this and stricter on who qualified for disability.
Man, I’ll never forget the old lady who lived next to us growing up. Worked all her life at the local nursing home. She lost half of her foot due to diabetes I think, and could barely walk.
Or anyone on benefits has to give a set number of minimum work hours to charity per week.
[удалено]
Good, that’s the way it should be.
[удалено]
Fucking pathetic. Quite sure there is nothing within the islamic faith that prevents them from working.
Then let's certainly hope Italy isn't one of those places where 'sex work is real work' rhetoric is mainstream.
I think most of Italy is Catholic so I doubt that, but yeah...they best have that written into law somewhere.
It is good, but it can have consequences too. In Germany they had a brief period where women were offered jobs in legal brothels and turning that down meant cutting benefits. They later carved out an exemption to sex work.
Sex work isnt legal yet in US. Only... nevada i think.
I agree, it is not a perfect system. Some jobs should be differently regulated than others. That being said, there are plenty of peolple who abuse unemployment benefits.
"We called it the 'pretty obvious if you think about it' resolution"
Based af lol love her
Welfares for those who are unable to work and in need of money to get by. Not a single cent for sloths who are perfectly eligible for employment yet refusing to get a job.
It should be that you only can get a month or two and then you loose it (obvious exceptions to disabled etc) and you can only get back on if you have a few months of taxes, if you constantly going onto benefits then you loose it all together for a two years, those who immigrate into the country cannot go onto benefits until they have 5 years of paying taxes etc but only receive limited benefits until 10 years of work.
The end part is pretty much/mostly in place.
And drug testing.
This gal have balls 😁
And like half of the country (Movimento 5 Stelle, coff coff) is mad at it because "muh the poor people". They are the ones who introduced it, and it's literally paying for votes.
Most European countries actually have this kind of policy. The issue usually isn't accepting/declining job offers, but accepting and then calling in sick until you get fired. Can't cut benefits for getting sick...
BasedAF
Can we do that in America
Good. She should.